ON 1- 14-19, MARGARET INGOGLIA SHOPLIFTS AT KMART WITH HER SON, 15 YEAR OLD JOE PALOMINO AND MY DAUGHTER, 4 YEAR OLD MARGARET MALEK. OF COURSE, THE JUDGE AND ACS IGNORE THIS MATTER AND NEVER PROVIDE ANY INVESTIGATION NOTES EITHER. AS TOLD TO ME BY A DETECTIVE, IF THE CHILDREN WERE PRESENT DURING HER SHOPLIFTING, MARGARET INGOGLIA COULD BE ARRESTED FOR ENDANGERING THE WELFARE OF HER CHILDREN. IF SHE HAD HER CHILDREN HELLP HER STEAL THEN SHE IS WITHOUT QUESTION ENDANGERING THE WELFARE OF HER CHILDREN. HOWEVER, NO ONE INVESTIGATED THIS BECAUSE KMART DIDNT PRESS CHARGES FOR THE 350 DOLLARS OF ITEMS ATTEMPTED TO BE STOLEN...HER LAWYER, ROBERT MAES, BDS, THEN RUNS TO MANHATTAN KMART TO CONVINCE THE MANAGER THERE NOT TO SAY ANTHING BECAUSE THERE IS A FAMILY COURT CASE OPEN AND YOU KNOW, YOU WOULDNT WANT TO HURT THE CASE FOR HIS CLIENT MARGARET INGOGLIA. THE HELL WITH THE KIDS....
SO WHERE IS THE ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILD AMY SERLIN / TRAVIS JOHNSON IN ALL THIS ? HAHAHA.
IF YOU SCROLL TO PAGE 43 YOU WILL FIND WHERE MARGARET INGOGLIA ADMITS HER SON JOE PALOMINO STOLE FROM ME REPEATEDLY.
IF YOU SCROLL TO PAGE 47 YOU WILL FIND WHERE MARGARET INGOGLIA CLAIMS JOE PALOMINO WAS STEALING FROM SEVERAL LOCATIONS WHEN THEY LIVED WITH HIS FATHER BEFORE HE KILLED HIM. WHOS FAULT WAS THIS STEALING ? SONS FATHER JUAN PALOMINO.
WHAT IS OBVIOUSLY CLEAR IS THAT THE THIEF IS MARGARET INGOGLIA WHOM TEACHES HER CHILDREN HOW TO STEAL JUST LIKE HER MOTHER JENNIE INGOGLIA WOULD STEAL FROM THE NURSING HOMES.
SO WHAT DOES ACS DO ABOUT THIS ?NOTHING. EXCEPT TRY TO PUT ME IN JAIL FOR MY LAWYER CALLING A PRIVATE INVESTIGATOR TO GO TO KMART TO FIND OUT WHAT HAPPENED. ACS ATTORNEY AND PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, ROSMIL ALMONTE THEN CLAIMS IN AN OSC THAT I HAD A PRIVATE INVESTIGATOR DO SURVEILLANCE ON THE FAMILY AND VIOLATED THE ORDER OF PROTECTION.OF COURSE THERE IS NO EVIDENDCE OF THIS !! BUT THAT DOESNT MATTER.
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE IS BELOW. HARD TO BELIEVE.
ACS COULD CARE LESS ABOUT MARGARET INGOGLIA SHOPLIFTING WITH THE CHILDREN.
IN THIS RESPONSE TO MOTIONS BY ROSMIL ALMONTE, ACS, ALMONTE CLAIMS ACS IS AN EXECUTIVE ENTERPRISE OF WHICH THE JUDGE CANNOT ORDER THEM TO DO ANYTHING. THE TRUTH IS, THE JUDGE CAN. NOTE FAMILY COURT ACT 255. NOW, WHILE THE JUDGE CANT DECIDE HOW MANY HOURS AN ACS WORKER CAN WORK THIS WEEK, ANYTHING REGARDING THE CHILD, THE JUDGE CAN.
IN ADDITION, THIS MOTION CLAIMS PHYSICAL AND EMOTIONAL ABUSE OF THE MOTHER IN THE PETITION WHEN THERE IS NO SUCH ALLEGATION OF PHYSICAL.